| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Al wrote:
Hm, why is that? How does an open stub prevent coupling from the antenna to the feedline? Roy Lewallen, W7EL I was hoping we would not have to go through this AGAIN. The typical J-Pole (Closed Stub) was designed to feed with open feed line. Because Hams insist on feeding it with coax, a Band-Aid is needed to choke off feed line radiation & common mode currents. The Open Stub J-Pole was designed to feed with coax. So it don't need the Band Aid. The difference between the two is discussed in several antenna books. Just ask anyone the owns one. (http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1613) Besides your the antenna expert, tell us why it would. 73 Al Lowe N0IMW Sorry, I didn't realize we'd been through it before. If you'll tell me the date, I'll look up the postings and review them. There are two things which can cause current on the feedline. One is by conduction. That mechanism is illustrated in Fig 21-1 at http://www.w2du/r2ch21.pdf, and elaborated on in http://eznec.com/Amateur/Articles/Baluns.pdf. Some types of feed systems can minimize this, and it looks like both the open and shorted stub feed systems are in this category. But it's the second mechanism I was talking about -- mutual coupling, or induction. Even if you have a perfect current balun (common mode choke) at the feedpoint or any sort of feed system you want, current can still be coupled to the feedline. In a center fed dipole, it won't occur if you first make sure there's no conducted current, and place the feedline symmetrically relative to the dipole to make the coupling from the two dipole halves cancel. But you can't do this with a ground plane, J-Pole, or similar antenna -- there will always be coupling from the antenna to the feedline. Fiddling with the feedpoint won't prevent it, although it might change the current distribution on the feedline. Changing the feedline length and/or orientation and/or using a couple of current baluns spaced about a quarter wavelength apart are two ways it can be minimized. I'd be interested in seeing any book which explains how a feedpoint modification can prevent current being coupled to the feedline (as opposed to being conducted). Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry, I didn't realize we'd been through it before. If you'll tell me
the date, I'll look up the postings and review them. There are two things which can cause current on the feedline. sniped I don't remember if you were involved or not Roy. It's been about 10 years ago. One I remember is Tom Raunch (hope I spelled that right). We argued for weeks about the OSJ until I sent him one. Some tried modeling it, some even claimed it would not work at all. The OSJ has been around for a long time, I did not invent it, I just build it better. I guess all antennas have feed line radiation and/or common mode currents to some degree. I suppose with the right equipment you can measure anything. But I think most would find a big difference between an OSJ & a CSJ Just because two antennas look similar, don't mean they work the same. Ok, that was fun, But I have wasted enough time, I got to get back to building Antennas. 73 Al Lowe N0IMW |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|