Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Old Ed wrote:
Hi Dan, My, you are a bit on the arrogant and foul-mouthed side, aren't you! It would be tedious to try and dissect your attributions of positions that I did not take, so I'll skip that. I'll just point out that as an E.E. with three degrees from a top-5 engineering school, and a lifelong specialization in RF engineering, I don't need any patronizing lectures from you. "Physician," heal thyself... or at least try to understand the difference between theoretical niceties and practical effects. Reading Dave's posts might help. (He's much more patient with twits than I am, and explains things well.) BTW, I have nothing against coax "baluns," unless they become physically awkward, or noticeably increase cable loss. Just catching up on things a week or so after the post you made. I suspect you have 3 EE degrees because you stated such, so you are obviously worlds smarter than I am, especially if it's from a "top 5 school", but since when does a coax choke balun cause loss of anything except feedline radiation, which you don't want anyway? Tom K0TAR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|