| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tim Wescott wrote:
I'm confused by your confusion -- what are you trying to do, and why do you have to ask? I'm not confused. I'm trying to alleviate Jim's confusion. :-) The next step is to slowly collimate the beam normal to the thin-film and watch what happens to the reflections. Jim implies there won't be an internal reflection from surface 'B' when the beam is collimated. I say it will still be there possessing energy and momentum. That's the crux of our argument. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Metal film resistors? | Homebrew | |||
| New Hitler film sheds new light on unique Finnish recording | Shortwave | |||
| Why do we use thin antennas? | Antenna | |||
| Tobacco film removal | Boatanchors | |||