Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Old Ed wrote: What could be sweeter? I'd say a 20m dipole, coax fed. Well, a 66 ft. dipole used on 20m does exhibit gain over a 33 ft. dipole used on 20m by almost 2 dB. . . . Most people can't or don't rotate a 66 foot dipole, and it has that much gain over a dipole half the length only in two specific directions. It has a gain of one dB or more over the shorter dipole only over 60 of the 360 degrees of the compass; and for 280 out of 360 degrees, it has *less* gain than the shorter dipole -- in fact as much as 14 dB less. For most people the longer dipole is a poor choice unless there's a specific narrow direction you want to favor at the expense of most other directions. You lose a lot of information when you reduce an antenna pattern to a single "gain" number, just as you do in reducing complex data to an average. Keep in mind the statistician who drowned while crossing a creek whose average depth was only three feet. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |