Tom Donaly wrote:
I guess people are getting sick and tired of your second-rate debating
technique, Cecil. I've seen Roy admit to mistakes time and again, while
the number of times you've admitted being wrong are essentially zero.

Typically biased, Tom. I have admitted I was wrong at a rate of
at least three to one compared to Roy. I feel sorry for you if you
agree with Roy that when a 50 ohm SWR meter reads 4:1, the system
is Z0-matched to 50 ohms. I feel sorry for you if you insist a lumped
circuit analysis is appropriate for a distributed network problem.
I feel sorry for you if you insist that EM waves can exist without
their associated ExH energy. I feel sorry for you if you deny that
interference plays any part in transmission line matching.

How about Roy's assertion that photonic energy "sloshes" back and
forth in a transmission line? I don't recall Einstein ever saying
such was even possible. Do you really believe that photonic energy
"sloshes" back and forth? If so, I've got some "Ocean Front Property
in Arizona" reserved especially for you.

You guys have a good old boys network going here that ignores the
laws of physics and reminds me of the Spanish Inquisition. Sorry,
once in history was once too many.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---