LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30   Report Post  
Old June 16th 05, 05:29 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:26:49 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
Now let's couch that in terms of your failed Thin Film proposition:
do you judge yourself by the same standard of "lack of response?"


The logical resonse to a demand for including refraction in a
purely conceptual lossless laser reflection example is:

"Somebody Get The Net!!!"

So, when judging yourself to that same standard, this is your
response? Yes, Ian did miss an opportunity to call out the net for
you.

I don't think that opportunity will be missed again. No one expects
you to correct your errors, that would be rational.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F/A New Motorola VHF portable antennas (Motorola Branded!!) Andy Swap 1 May 26th 04 09:22 PM
F/A New Motorola VHF portable antennas (Motorola Branded!!) Andy Swap 0 May 18th 04 10:14 PM
FA Motorola VHF rubber duck Antennas $4.99 ea. Dealer cost $8.70 List $11.80 Andy Swap 0 May 17th 04 01:46 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Shortwave 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017