Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:26:49 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: Now let's couch that in terms of your failed Thin Film proposition: do you judge yourself by the same standard of "lack of response?" The logical resonse to a demand for including refraction in a purely conceptual lossless laser reflection example is: "Somebody Get The Net!!!" So, when judging yourself to that same standard, this is your response? Yes, Ian did miss an opportunity to call out the net for you. I don't think that opportunity will be missed again. No one expects you to correct your errors, that would be rational. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|