Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
Richard Harrison wrote: To determine reverse power flow, the polarity of one of the samples is reversed. And here you've made that big leap again. Where did "power" come from? Nothing in what you or I have said above explains how come the meter can read "Watts". Bird assumes the meter is being used in a 50 ohm environment. Bird assumes after the two sample voltages are superposed, that the calibration is accurate to within 5% of full scale. The calibration is done using 50 ohm matched lines. In a transmission line, the net power transfer is V*I*cos(theta). It can be proven mathematically that, for a transmission line with reflections, Pnet = V*I*cos(theta) = Vfor*Ifor - Vref*Iref The Bird sampling circuit allows one to read either (Vfor*Ifor) or (Vref*Iref) by turning the slug. Bird assumes Vfor/Ifor = Vref/Iref = 50 ohms. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflected Energy | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
Cecil's Math a Blunder | Antenna |