Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Owen wrote: Indeed. It occurs to me that if one was to try to measure VSWR (say using a slotted line with probe) on a lossy line operating at high VSWR, the best estimate would come from finding a minimum, measuring it and the adjacent maxima and calculating VSWR=(Vmax1+Vmax2)/Vmin/2 so that the measurement is biassed towards the notional VSWR at the point of the minimum (the minimum being much more sensitive to line attenuation than the maxima). If you think about exponential decay along the line, the geometric mean sqrt(Vmax1 * Vmax2) would be an even better replacement for Vmax, to use in the numerator, than the arithmetic mean (Vmax1 * Vmax2)/2. David, ex-W8EZE -- David Ryeburn To send e-mail, use "ca" instead of "caz". |