LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24   Report Post  
Old June 23rd 05, 05:08 PM
Tom Donaly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Owen wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:

Given a 396 meter length of Radio Shack RG58. At 250 kiloherz TLD says
(after some manipulation) that it has a propagation constant of
689.6 X 10^-9 + j7.933 X 10^-3. Zo is 50 -j4.344. Feed it with a



Doesn't that imply that the the matched line loss at 0.25MHz is
689.6E-9*20*e^1*100 dB/100m?

That is 0.0006dB/100m, it seems too good to be true!

Owen

Hi Owen,
It is too good to be true. (Just consider it came from an unusually
good batch.) The whole exercise is nonsensical, though,
because it results in negative power and a negative SWR. Increase the
loss to a more realistic value and the negative power goes away as
does the negative SWR while the absolute value of the reflection
coefficient is still greater than 1. I was hoping I could get some
kind of nut philosophical justification for negative average power
out of Cecil, but you sprang the trap.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017