Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Roy Lewallen wrote:
But under no circumstances should you actually stoop to reading the paper you're so fond of criticizing. Are BLE's original papers available on the web? If not, that does represent a substantial problem. Despite having several derivative references, I must admit to never having seen the originals either. But I do have enough information to judge BLE's work worthy of respect. Pioneers always deserve an extra helping of respect because - unlike everyone else, including all their critics - they didn't have the benefit of perfect hindsight. On the other hand, that work was done almost three-quarters of a century ago. If we don't know more than the pioneers did, then we have wasted their efforts. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What tool to measure SWR at 910 Mhz? | Antenna | |||
Can you measure and post your DTMF Twist? | General | |||
Measure Z with Vector Voltmeter properly | Antenna | |||
Ground rods in rocky soil | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |