Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... Many, if not all, FM broadcast stations in the US transmit both a vertically and horizontally polarized signal. So, rotating the antenna 45 degrees is not giving up anything. ================================ Simultaneous transmission of vertical and and horizontal polarised signals from a single antenna system is impossible without upsetting the desired radiation coverage pattern. What you mean is your clever US broadcasting engineers have designed antennas which radiate "Circularly Polarised" signals. If you go to a broadcaster's web site, they will say X KW horizontal, and X KW vertical, with no reference to right or left hand polarization. I take that to mean cross polarized, rather than circular. Obviously, the reason for the vertical component is car radios. As for messing up the pattern, I would think that in the majority of cases they want equal propagation in all directions Tam/WB2TT As Cecil says, nobody gains anything power-wise. For the same transmitter radiated power everybody's signals are 3 dB down (half-power) relative to simple linear polarision when both transmitting and receiving antennas have the same polarisation. The advantage of circular polarisation is that it doesn't matter which polarisation your antenna is orientated because, in practice, when erecting it, the polarisation received by your antenna is usually a matter of guesswork anyway. Only with relatively-rare, direct line-of-sight broadcasting propagation is there any certainty in the polarisation of received signals. ---- Reg. |