Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Who said powers can never be added? Must have been someone who was unfamiliar with the expression 'figures can lie and liars can figure'. :-) You reckon Eugene Hecht was lying when he shows us how to add two irradiances to obtain the total irradiance (power per unit-area) in _Optics_? Eugene Hecht doesn't have a dog in this fight, Cecil. But the quote is a truism that applies in any case. Wrong numbers added correctly produce a wrong number; correct numbers added incorrectly produce an incorrect number; and in the special case, certain wrong numbers added in a particular incorrect way can produce a desired result. You take too great a liberty with the name Eugene Hecht. Among the things which won't be found in any of Dr. Hecht's texts is a minus sign in front of number expressing an irradiance. Nor will we find a negative scalar quantity accompanied by the claim that the negative sign indicates a change in direction, as you have done. Eugene Hecht also did not claim that interference could be a cause for energy to reflect or otherwise change direction, as you have done. Such claims are blatently false. Power and irradiance are derived and dependent quantities, not fundamental independent quantities in nature. And although an automobile moves at some speed, the scaler quantity itself is not something which moves. Similarly, power and irradiance do not physically propagate and they do not physically interact. 'They' do not reflect, refract, diffract, disperse, interfere, or act upon other 'powers' or 'irradiances'. JC Maxwell and others observed that it is electric and magnetic fields which propagate, interact with matter, and add algebraically and vectorially. When fields physically interact with matter, we can measure their effect and can quantify such things as voltage, current, and heat, and hence calculate such things as power or irradiance. But it is actually the fields themselves which algebraically sum. Of course the interference equation accurately expresses power and irradiance. The fact that power and irradiance generally go as the square of the fields allows us to correctly make certain additional mathematical assumptions. One must still be careful not to mistake an effect for a cause. But it is the 2nd Amendment, the internet, and the absence of peer review which afford men the freedom and means to work equations and describe physical phenomena in any way they like. 73, ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
THIS will solve that pesky Darfur problem... | Shortwave | |||
(OT) - Solve The Beal Conjecture and win $100,000 | Shortwave | |||
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Scanner | |||
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Shortwave |