Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
[Hecht rolls his eyes] I'm going to trim and ignore the condescending ad hominem stuff. ... the math follows the physics, it does not create the physics. Your argument has that exact flaw. "What Cecil is describing doesn't exist in the common math model. Therefore, the math model prohibits it from existing in physics." Please follow your own advice. There is a vast gulf between being descriptive and being prohibitive. There is a vast gulf between being descriptive and being proscriptive. I didn't choose to quote the entire book, Richard. Hecht also says: "If two or more electromagnetic waves arrive at point P out-of-phase and cancel, 'What does that mean as far as their energy is concerned?' Energy can be distributed, but it doesn’t cancel out. ... The superposition of coherent waves generally has the effect of altering the spatial distribution of the energy but not the total amount (of energy) present." "Altering the spatial distribution of the energy" in a transmission line is a binary function since there are only two directions. If the spatial distribution is altered, it necessarily changes directions. The following does explicitly state a change in direction, i.e. "A NEW DIRECTION". http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/j...ons/index.html "When two waves of equal amplitude and wavelength that are 180-degrees out of phase with each other meet, they are not actually annihilated. All of the photon energy present in these waves must somehow be recovered or REDISTRIBUTED IN A NEW DIRECTION, according to the law of energy conservation ... Instead, upon meeting, the photons are redistributed to regions that permit constructive interference, so the effect should be considered as a redistribution of light waves and photon energy rather than the spontaneous construction or destruction of light." (Emphasis mine.) A transmission line has only two directions. If wave cancellation, i.e. permanent destructive interference, takes place in one direction, the necessary corresponding constructive interference must be "redistributed in a new direction". In a transmission line, there is only one "new direction", the opposite direction from the old direction. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
THIS will solve that pesky Darfur problem... | Shortwave | |||
(OT) - Solve The Beal Conjecture and win $100,000 | Shortwave | |||
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Scanner | |||
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Shortwave |