On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:56:19 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Your assertion that I
diverge from Hecht or Richard presuming to roll Hecht's eyes
for him contains zero technical content from which I learn
nothing.
Amusing, when I quote Hecht, it is presumption, when you quote Hecht,
it is receiving tablets on Ararat.

Well it beats your impersonation of Galileo.

That's OK, no one expects you to respond to Jim's point drawn from
Hecht.