Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Your assertion that I
diverge from Hecht or Richard presuming to roll Hecht's eyes
for him contains zero technical content from which I learn
nothing.

Amusing, when I quote Hecht, it is presumption, ...

I am not objecting to your quoting Hecht. I am objecting
to you being presumptious enough to roll someone else's
eyeballs. How do you know Hecht is not rolling his
eyeballs at your postings?

The only time I remember you quoting Hecht was with some
irrelevant refraction stuff having nothing to do with
transmission lines or with the perfect laser example.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 07:03:00 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
having nothing to do with
transmission lines or with the perfect laser example.
What a hoot! Your sacred cows mew.