Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote: Richard Clark wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: Born and Wolf has an interesting comment in the section on total reflection. "...the electromagnetic field in the second medium does not disappear, only there is no longer a flow of energy across the boundary." your source, and yet unable or unwilling to confront this single observation. Apparently that would mean the waves aren't traveling at the speed of light and it would violate his "waves cannot exist without energy" law of physics, so therefore the book is wrong. Wrong. All it means is that reflected energy doesn't make it across the match point. It says, and means more than just that, obviously. "... when two waves of equal amplitude and wavelength that are 180-degrees out of phase with each other meet, they are (canceled but) not actually annihilated. All of the photon energy present in these waves must somehow be recovered or redistributed in a new direction, according to the law of energy conservation. (There are only two directions available in a transmission line.) Instead, upon meeting, the photons are redistributed to regions that permit constructive interference, so the effect should be considered as a redistribution of light waves and photon energy (back toward the load) rather than the spontaneous construction or destruction of light." (Words in parentheses are mine added for clarity.) Interesting to note that the interference phenomenon is often described as a redistribution, but is never described in any reference as a reflection, or re-reflection as you have done. The reason is that when light destructively interferes in some direction, it simply does not go in that direction. It doesn't, contrary to your assertion, first go in the reflected direction, say oooops, then turn around in mid-air and go in the other direction. The reflection is prevented. Comprende senor? The Bird wattmeter can be misleading in this regard. It measures the effect of a field (sometimes like the one in Born and Wolf that doesn't have transfer of energy associated with it), and in every case assumes energy and power. But it's simple minded so it has an excuse. 73, ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
THIS will solve that pesky Darfur problem... | Shortwave | |||
(OT) - Solve The Beal Conjecture and win $100,000 | Shortwave | |||
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Scanner | |||
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Shortwave |