Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
It comes as no great surprise that this simple example of optical power is so powerfully baffling to a neophyte. Who said it is baffling? The problem is that if you cannot understand the simplest of examples involving lossless, refractionless, laser systems, you cannot possibly understand anything more complicated. I haven't even read past your inability to understand that simple example. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:35:16 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: The problem is that if you cannot understand the simplest of examples involving lossless, refractionless, laser systems, you cannot possibly understand anything more complicated. Um, yes. Can tell us why your example exhibits a reflection product TEN TIMES BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN; when in your words it has canceled completely? :-) This question, like others, is likely to suffer the fate of you whining on about "understanding." Go ahead anyway, it establishes you as an academy of one - just don't chew the scenery. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: The problem is that if you cannot understand the simplest of examples involving lossless, refractionless, laser systems, you cannot possibly understand anything more complicated. Um, yes. Can tell us why your example exhibits a reflection product TEN TIMES BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN; when in your words it has canceled completely? :-) It doesn't. All reflections are eliminated by wave cancellation. That is a given boundary condition for the simple example. You can argue that there's no such thing in reality as a dimensionless point or a line of only one dimension or a plane of only two dimensions. That doesn't keep such from being taught as concepts in every plane geometry class. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 01:45:26 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: Um, yes. Can tell us why your example exhibits a reflection product TEN TIMES BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN; when in your words it has canceled completely? :-) It doesn't. All reflections are eliminated by wave cancellation. That is a given boundary condition for the simple example. What a larf. :-) If you can't explain it, you simply re-write the math to suit the outcome? This is neither demonstrable nor provable, unless, of course you simply fudge the numbers until they agree with your result. Given that every reader here has had the opposite experience as your prediction, this is classic thumb on the scale work - quite shabby. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Um, yes. Can tell us why your example exhibits a reflection product TEN TIMES BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN; when in your words it has canceled completely? :-) It doesn't. All reflections are eliminated by wave cancellation. That is a given boundary condition for the simple example. If you can't explain it, you simply re-write the math to suit the outcome? The purpose of the laser example is to make it as much like a transmission line example as possible. A Bird wattmeter indicates that all reflections are eliminated in the T-line example so the laser example assumes that as a boundary condition. Your insistance on rewriting the math to make it as different from a T-line example as possible is simply a diversion away from the original purpose. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:42:22 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: The purpose of the laser example is to make it as much like a transmission line example as possible. A Bird wattmeter indicates that all reflections are eliminated Never met the class of Bird wattmeter that measures laser - and neither have you. Get your thumb off the scale and put it where it belongs. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
THIS will solve that pesky Darfur problem... | Shortwave | |||
(OT) - Solve The Beal Conjecture and win $100,000 | Shortwave | |||
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Scanner | |||
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Shortwave |