Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 10:35 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:
It comes as no great surprise that this simple example of optical
power is so powerfully baffling to a neophyte.


Who said it is baffling? The problem is that if you cannot understand
the simplest of examples involving lossless, refractionless, laser
systems, you cannot possibly understand anything more complicated.
I haven't even read past your inability to understand that simple
example.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 18th 05, 11:55 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:35:16 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

The problem is that if you cannot understand
the simplest of examples involving lossless, refractionless, laser
systems, you cannot possibly understand anything more complicated.


Um, yes. Can tell us why your example exhibits a reflection product
TEN TIMES BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN; when in your words it has canceled
completely? :-)

This question, like others, is likely to suffer the fate of you
whining on about "understanding." Go ahead anyway, it establishes you
as an academy of one - just don't chew the scenery.
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 07:45 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
The problem is that if you cannot understand
the simplest of examples involving lossless, refractionless, laser
systems, you cannot possibly understand anything more complicated.


Um, yes. Can tell us why your example exhibits a reflection product
TEN TIMES BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN; when in your words it has canceled
completely? :-)


It doesn't. All reflections are eliminated by wave cancellation.
That is a given boundary condition for the simple example.

You can argue that there's no such thing in reality as a
dimensionless point or a line of only one dimension or a
plane of only two dimensions. That doesn't keep such from
being taught as concepts in every plane geometry class.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 08:29 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 01:45:26 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Um, yes. Can tell us why your example exhibits a reflection product
TEN TIMES BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN; when in your words it has canceled
completely? :-)


It doesn't. All reflections are eliminated by wave cancellation.
That is a given boundary condition for the simple example.


What a larf. :-)

If you can't explain it, you simply re-write the math to suit the
outcome? This is neither demonstrable nor provable, unless, of course
you simply fudge the numbers until they agree with your result. Given
that every reader here has had the opposite experience as your
prediction, this is classic thumb on the scale work - quite shabby.
  #5   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 08:42 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Um, yes. Can tell us why your example exhibits a reflection product
TEN TIMES BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN; when in your words it has canceled
completely? :-)


It doesn't. All reflections are eliminated by wave cancellation.
That is a given boundary condition for the simple example.


If you can't explain it, you simply re-write the math to suit the
outcome?


The purpose of the laser example is to make it as much like a
transmission line example as possible. A Bird wattmeter indicates
that all reflections are eliminated in the T-line example so
the laser example assumes that as a boundary condition. Your
insistance on rewriting the math to make it as different from a
T-line example as possible is simply a diversion away from the
original purpose.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


  #6   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 08:47 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:42:22 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

The purpose of the laser example is to make it as much like a
transmission line example as possible. A Bird wattmeter indicates
that all reflections are eliminated


Never met the class of Bird wattmeter that measures laser - and
neither have you. Get your thumb off the scale and put it where it
belongs.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
THIS will solve that pesky Darfur problem... running dogg Shortwave 3 March 13th 05 10:59 PM
(OT) - Solve The Beal Conjecture and win $100,000 [email protected] Shortwave 0 December 10th 04 04:36 PM
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? ScanGwinnett Scanner 5 July 12th 04 02:09 PM
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? ScanGwinnett Shortwave 5 July 12th 04 02:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017