| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Kelley wrote:
Richard Harrison wrote: When the source end of a transmission line is effectively a short or open circuit, ir re-reflects the reflected wave. Are we then supposed to infer that it [the source] doesn't re-reflect the wave if anything other than a short or open circuit appears there? To that list of two, we can add two more. If the source end of a transmission line is terminated in a pure reactance, it re-reflects the reflected wave. When 100% wave cancellation of reflected waves occurs at the source due to total destructive interference, it re-reflects the reflected wave energy components as constructive interference energy in the opposite direction. Anything else would violate the conservation of energy principle. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| THIS will solve that pesky Darfur problem... | Shortwave | |||
| (OT) - Solve The Beal Conjecture and win $100,000 | Shortwave | |||
| Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Scanner | |||
| Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Shortwave | |||