Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 08:23 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

the wavelength doesn't matter so 632.8 nm might be a logical popular choice.


2. a popular choice? This conjecture is broadly announced with the
characteristic couching of terms "might be" to hedge the answer.


Actually, I got that wavelength from _Optics_, by Hecht.
Hecht says: "The He-Ne laser is still among the most popular
devices of it kind, ... (632.8 nm)." So your argument is with
Hecht, not with me. Good luck on that one.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 08:38 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:23:32 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Good luck on that one.

Luck is unnecessary when the quote is so obviously disassociated from
the context of Glare or its wavelength. Such a struggle you put on,
like an old wife wriggling into a girdle. Such exhibitionism would be
pornographic if it weren't so comic. :-)
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 09:00 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Good luck on that one.


That was "good luck on disagreeing with Hecht" which is exactly
what you did and trimmed out the details in hopes nobody would
notice. I honestly don't know what is the most popular laser
wavelength. I had to rely on Hecht for that answer.

Luck is unnecessary when the quote is so obviously disassociated from
the context of Glare or its wavelength. Such a struggle you put on,
like an old wife wriggling into a girdle. Such exhibitionism would be
pornographic if it weren't so comic. :-)


I'm sure you are a glare expert and I'm just as sure that your
postings on glare are completely irrelevant, an obvious diversion
in your feeble attempt to change the subject away from what is
important. Why are you so afraid to deal with my example including
the boundary conditions? Why are you so accepting of an ideal
transmission line yet so unaccepting of an ideal thin-film?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 09:38 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:00:06 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Why are you so afraid to deal with my example including the boundary conditions?


You've forgotten so soon? This marks twice we've been through this
complaint - not including the actual posting that responds directly to
your statement. Your Netzheimer affliction can be aided by a visit to
the archive. However, you will have another forgetting opportunity
when I soon revisit those results posted some time ago. :-)
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
THIS will solve that pesky Darfur problem... running dogg Shortwave 3 March 13th 05 10:59 PM
(OT) - Solve The Beal Conjecture and win $100,000 [email protected] Shortwave 0 December 10th 04 04:36 PM
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? ScanGwinnett Scanner 5 July 12th 04 02:09 PM
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? ScanGwinnett Shortwave 5 July 12th 04 02:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017