Fred W4JLE wrote:
Cecil, glare is truly in the eye of the beholder. Glare and reflections are
two different animals.

Indeed, "non-glare glass" was a misnomer and I appologize
for that mistake in word selection. Reflections, not
glare, was the actual topic of discussion. "Glare" or
"non-glare" does not even appear in the index of _Optics_,
by Hecht.

I should have called the thin-film function "non-reflective"
instead of "non-glare". Glare is actually totally irrelevant
to anything I have posted including the original example.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---