Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 10th 05, 10:38 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From 'inventor' Hately's original descriptions of his CFA, it is so
glaringly obviously a load of nonsense that anybody who takes the time
to mathematically expose the fraud, himself exposes his own weakness
and uncertainty in the subject and has already been partially taken in
by it.

Waste no more time.
----
Reg.


  #2   Report Post  
Old July 10th 05, 10:54 AM
Polymath
 
Posts: n/a
Default

One of my purposes in scraping off the rust from 34 years'
of unused E-M theory was specifically so that I could evaluate
the claims made for the CFA.

I was intrigued by the claims but at no times taken in by them.

But yes - I exposed my ignorance but not any weakness, but there is never
any
problem with such exposure if it is done in an open spirit of eagerness to
learn!

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
From 'inventor' Hately's original descriptions of his CFA, it is so
glaringly obviously a load of nonsense that anybody who takes the time
to mathematically expose the fraud, himself exposes his own weakness
and uncertainty in the subject and has already been partially taken in
by it.
Waste no more time.



  #3   Report Post  
Old July 10th 05, 12:21 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I see you are accustomed to self analysis. Not a bad thing.

But you unwittingly lowered yourself to the CFA level.

On the other hand, you have rapidly caught up with your true potential
which exceeds mine.

I have been worried about your recent absence and silence. Fearing the
worst in this gradually extending police state. Welcome back!

=======================================

"Polymath" wrote in message
...
One of my purposes in scraping off the rust from 34 years'
of unused E-M theory was specifically so that I could evaluate
the claims made for the CFA.

I was intrigued by the claims but at no times taken in by them.

But yes - I exposed my ignorance but not any weakness, but there is

never
any
problem with such exposure if it is done in an open spirit of

eagerness to
learn!

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
From 'inventor' Hately's original descriptions of his CFA, it is

so
glaringly obviously a load of nonsense that anybody who takes the

time
to mathematically expose the fraud, himself exposes his own

weakness
and uncertainty in the subject and has already been partially

taken in
by it.
Waste no more time.





  #4   Report Post  
Old July 10th 05, 12:25 PM
Polymath
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thank-you for your kind words.

At 6'3" and 20 stone, I fear that my potential,
gravitational at least, exceeds that of most people!

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
I see you are accustomed to self analysis. Not a bad thing.
But you unwittingly lowered yourself to the CFA level.
On the other hand, you have rapidly caught up with your true potential
which exceeds mine.
I have been worried about your recent absence and silence. Fearing the
worst in this gradually extending police state. Welcome back!



  #5   Report Post  
Old July 10th 05, 03:02 PM
Wankel Rotary
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Polymath wrote:
Thank-you for your kind words.

At 6'3" and 20 stone, I fear that my potential,
gravitational at least, exceeds that of most people!


....and those are just the dimensions of your head so we believe!

Toot toot old son.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017