Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see you are accustomed to self analysis. Not a bad thing.
But you unwittingly lowered yourself to the CFA level. On the other hand, you have rapidly caught up with your true potential which exceeds mine. I have been worried about your recent absence and silence. Fearing the worst in this gradually extending police state. Welcome back! ======================================= "Polymath" wrote in message ... One of my purposes in scraping off the rust from 34 years' of unused E-M theory was specifically so that I could evaluate the claims made for the CFA. I was intrigued by the claims but at no times taken in by them. But yes - I exposed my ignorance but not any weakness, but there is never any problem with such exposure if it is done in an open spirit of eagerness to learn! "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... From 'inventor' Hately's original descriptions of his CFA, it is so glaringly obviously a load of nonsense that anybody who takes the time to mathematically expose the fraud, himself exposes his own weakness and uncertainty in the subject and has already been partially taken in by it. Waste no more time. |