LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 11th 05, 07:48 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Fry wrote:

"Reg Edwards"
As Cecil says, a wider than expected bandwidth in an antenna of given
size, is an absolutely sure sign of greater loss somewhere in the
wideband antenna system.


I don't know your definition of an "expected bandwidth," but for a
reality check--many forms of panel antennas used in FM and TV broadcast
transmission have 20% or better SWR bandwidth, and radiate nearly every
watt that can be delivered by the feedline with almost NO "matching"
losses. They have been in routine use for decades at master antenna
transmit sites all over the world.


And, for the record, it wasn't me who said that.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017