| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Frank wrote:
I am not aware of a damper ever being considered a storage device. Capacitance is equivalent to mass, Inductance is equivalent to a spring, and resistance equivalent to a damper. Am I missing something? Nope. But the OP, now posting as 'Polymath', had said "The same analogy applies to springs and to shock absorbers; the spring stores energy when stretched; the shock-absorber stores energy when compressed. Both the spring and shock absorber will return energy at some time and this exhibit reactance!" But the shock-absorber stores...nothing, and can return nothing. It therefore cannot have the mechanical equivalent of reactance, and cannot therefore be a part of a frequency-determining mechanism. He had failed to appreciate the property of mass - a rather fundamental point. That is why I said he was an idiot - a claim I see no reason to change. from Aero Spike |