You have to make allowances for Mrs.Nugatory. As always,
I responded very quickly to a genuine request for help, but
responded to the lead given by the questioner who
mentioned spring/damper rather than spring/mass, and so
I responded off-the-cuff without too much forethought.

Better a quick response than none at all, or a response that
had the hallmarks of a 13-year old mind that requires a
literal meaning for everything, as does Mrs.Nugatory!

I acknowledged the error in a subsequent posting but Mrs. Nugatory
is a chronic paranoid obsessive who latches onto every thing that I say,
and hounds the thing to death, as she is doing below, many months
after the ephemeral chit-chat has ceased to have any relevance.

For example, if you seek out the time that I alerted Usenet users to
the availability of cheap dehumidifiers, Mrs.Nugatory managed to spin out
over 50 pages of insistence that I knew nothing about them!

Mentally deranged, or what!

"Frank" wrote in message
news:99iAe.145698$on1.40186@clgrps13...
"Spike" wrote in message
...
Polly parrotted:

Actually, just did a quick webbing and found enough to
realise that the claims are founded upon feet of clay.....

1. You do not separately excite the E and H fields because
if you excite an E field, you get a corresponding H field, and
vice-versa,
even if it is your intention to excite separately.

Can this be the same idiot who thought that a spring/damper
combination was the mechanical equivalent of a coil and capacitor, on
the grounds that they both exhibited resonance?

from
Aero Spike

The spring and damper can be exactly model as an electrical analog; as can
virtually any physical system. As a reference refer to "Dynamics of
Physical Circuits and Systems", by Lindsay and Katz at Concordia
University, Montreal. ISBN 0-916460-21-5 published by Matrix of
Beaverton OR.

Frank