right.
A
****in'



On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:35:22 GMT, Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
wrote:

Usenet?
on
it
do
why
so
not
thought
I
backwards?
everything
write
normally
you
Do
NunYa Bidness wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:50:34 -0400, Ham op Gave
us:


I've used the internet since 1985 [DARPA net] and have yet to see the
11th commandment prohibiting top posting or forcing bottom posting.

I prefer TOP POSTING. I've read the original message previously



It isn't about what you have read, or what you have stored. Get a
clue.


, it is
stored sequentially on my computer sorted by thread and date if I need a
refresher, and I don't have to scroll through a lot of attached garbage
to get to your meaningful or meaningless comments.


What you fail to realize is that what you have stored, and the
manner which you read Usenet is not how everyone does it. The
protocols (which do exist) are in place to increase understanding of
the post from that very post, without the need to look up or download
additional posts. Are you getting it yet?


TOP POSTING, IMO, provides much more efficient use of my time.


You are what Usenet users that actually know what the forum is about
call LAZY. How hard can it be, and a few seconds is not some critical
number. Are you really that pathetic?


Get a life. There's much more to life than criticizing where a response
is posted.


Funny that the only places idiots like you conform is when there is
no way to get what you want otherwise, or if a cop has a gun pointed
at you. You are the same type of idiot I see here in California that
doesn't stop for stopped traffic. They traverse either to the right
or left like little inertial idiots, or the idiots that wear their
pants down past their ass.
YAWN! Another 12 year old who thinks he pioneered the universe.