Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil wrote:
"If not, what other homebrew antenna will be fine for the purpose?" I believe Walter Maxwell, W2DU, while working with RCA`s satellite program, designed quadrafilar helix antennas to communicate with the birds. Look at their pattern on page 765 of Kraus` 3rd edition of "Antennas", then compare with patterns shown on pages 763 and 764. The advantage is clear. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Phil wrote: "If not, what other homebrew antenna will be fine for the purpose?" I believe Walter Maxwell, W2DU, while working with RCA`s satellite program, designed quadrafilar helix antennas to communicate with the birds. Look at their pattern on page 765 of Kraus` 3rd edition of "Antennas", then compare with patterns shown on pages 763 and 764. The advantage is clear. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI Because one of the very important functions of a TV antenna is to reduce multi-path interference causing fading and ghosting, directionality is essential. The quadrifilar helix I'm familiar with is a normal-mode helix; that is, the maximum radiation or reception is broadside to the helix, and it has an omnidirectional horizontal pattern when the axis is vertical. That would be a poor choice for a TV antenna. You might, though, consider an axial mode helix. That's one which has maximum radiation or reception in the direction of the helix axis. I don't have any direct experience with them, but believe they can be made fairly broadbanded. It might be pretty large and cumbersome, though. You should be able to find design data on the web for an axial mode helix. Sorry, I don't have the third edition of Kraus yet. Is there really a fairly directional quadrifilar helix in it? In the second edition, the quadrifilar helix is described as a normal mode helix, which is my experience, and the pattern shown in the book of a conventional normal mode helix resembles that of a dipole as it should. Quadrifilar helices are commonly used for GPS receivers, where an omnidirectional pattern is desirable. By the way, I finally got a copy of Bailey -- I came across a copy the other day at Powell's Technical Bookstore, for $15! Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arrgh! I confused this thread with a recent one asking about UHF TV
antennas. My response wasn't at all appropriate to this discussion. I agree completely with Richard Harrison, a quadrifilar helix is probably a good choice for this application. I sincerely apologize to Richard and other readers for my carelessness and mistake. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Roy Lewallen wrote: Because one of the very important functions of a TV antenna is to reduce multi-path interference causing fading and ghosting, directionality is essential. The quadrifilar helix I'm familiar with is a normal-mode helix; that is, the maximum radiation or reception is broadside to the helix, and it has an omnidirectional horizontal pattern when the axis is vertical. That would be a poor choice for a TV antenna. . . |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen, W7EL wrote:
"Because one of the very important functions of TV antennas is to introduce multipath interference causing fading and ghosting, directionality is essential." Yes indeed! In an urban invironment that is especially important. I`ve fought the battle to suppress ghosting and smearing. But, my signal sources were nearly horizontal and they reflected like billiard balls from every reflective object they encountered. Reflections were often in the horizontal plane same as the incident signal. I would think that shortly after a satellite makes it above the horizon, the incudent wave`s reflected signals would be headed skyward and be unlikely to cause much trouble at the receiver. The quadrafilar helix pattern appears something like a mushroom. Roy also wrote: "Sorry, I don`t have the 3rd edition of Kraus yet." I only recently got it. Now I think it is unfortunate I didn`t have it on order before it was released. It is crammed with good stuff. Roy also wrote: "By the way, I finally got a copy of Bailey ---I came across a copy the other day at Powell`s Technical Bookstore for $15 ! " Congratulations! Hope you enjoy it as much as I. His catalog pf various antennas is without par. His theory is systematic and concise. He must have been a tremendous asset at Bell Labs. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen, W7EL wrote:
"I confused this thread with a recent one asking about UHF TV antennas." I understand. My strugle with TV reflections involved antennas atop the corporate headquarters. We had to have a perfect color picture in the executive lounge and there was no cable yet. The founder, chairmman and CEO was proud of his luxury and toys. We had a lot of signal, but too many signals due to other skyscrapers around ours. With sharp enough antennas we were able to clean up the mess. Better a hero than a goat! I think I was very lucky today. I had typed the previous posting and was about to hit the send button when the electric power failed. I was sure it would mean retyping. However, when power was restored, I wert to the archive and found it in storage. Hooray! Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is it ! http://members.aol.com/k5oe/ The Eggbeater2 guys, I
think ? .. After reading Gerald's information on how to construct this antenna I was left unclear about the dimensions table and all the digits shown there. 1) What do they stand for, and how to apply them in the construcion of the antenna ? And another thing: Is there any spacing between the loops when they cross eachother on top and on the bottom ? How about the reflectors, they must be spaced out if they cross eachother inside the boom ? How much is the space ? Thank you very much again. Phil |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Harrison"
I understand. My strugle with TV reflections involved antennas atop the corporate headquarters. We had to have a perfect color picture in the executive lounge and there was no cable yet. The founder, chairmman and CEO was proud of his luxury and toys. We had a lot of signal, but too many signals due to other skyscrapers around ours. With sharp enough antennas we were able to clean up the mess. Better a hero than a goat! _____________ Here's another war story. Many Chicago TV stations moved to the new Hancock Bldg to use one of the RCA antennas that were stacked there on two masts. When one of the big network O&O stations flipped the switch to start using this new site, the on-air picture at their studio turned to absolute garbage, right in front of all the executive staff gathered in a boardroom to celebrate. The studio was located about four blocks from the Hancock Bldg, and close to the null in the elevation pattern of the new 2-bay antenna they had switched to. Most of the RF they could pick up was from reflections. I think they finally installed a very high gain antenna skewed upward up at a large elevation angle focused at the top of the Hancock Bldg, but the best picture they got was never very good. RF (RCA field supervisor during the installation and commissioning of the TV antenna systems) |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "philnyc" wrote in message oups.com... This is it ! http://members.aol.com/k5oe/ The Eggbeater2 guys, I think ? . After reading Gerald's information on how to construct this antenna I was left unclear about the dimensions table and all the digits shown there. 1) What do they stand for, and how to apply them in the construcion of the antenna ? And another thing: Is there any spacing between the loops when they cross eachother on top and on the bottom ? How about the reflectors, they must be spaced out if they cross eachother inside the boom ? How much is the space ? Thank you very much again. Phil Phil You might search on "Cebik". He shows very good information on how to build a Moxon Rectangle Turnstile. Jerry |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
. After reading Gerald's information on how to construct this
antenna I was left unclear about the dimensions table and all the digits shown there. 1) What do they stand for, and how to apply them in the construcion of the antenna ? And another thing: Is there any spacing between the loops when they cross eachother on top and on the bottom ? How about the reflectors, they must be spaced out if they cross eachother inside the boom ? How much is the space ? Thank you very much again. ============================ Would you like him to come along and build it for you? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna |