Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
gregB wrote:
Roy, thanks for the reply. So how do they do it? Greg. Making a decent antenna that works over the very wide bandwidth of the TV UHF band isn't at all trivial. And there's a great big handful of tradeoffs -- gain, front/back ratio, impedance match, physical size, number of elements, sidelobe levels, and bandwidth among them. The UHF TV antennas I've seen are mostly a combination of log periodic, Yagi, and corner reflector types -- something like a few log periodic elements with some parasitic (Yagi) elements and a corner reflector. There *are* some formulas which can be used for pure log periodics and corner reflectors -- you should be able to find them on the web, and a serviceable if not optimum antenna could be made with either or both techniques. You'll have to decide how to best make the tradeoffs for your application. The main difficulty with a corner reflector is making a very broadband driven element. I imagine that beyond designing a basic log periodic or corner reflector structure, most manufacturers do a bunch of cut and try. These days, I'm sure they use modeling programs for it. I'm also sure that after some years of designing the things, the engineers get a feel for the general effect of certain techniques -- say, how to improve the front/back ratio with the minimal number of added elements. Some of the bigger companies might have developed some optimization software. If they have, it's probably kept as a trade secret. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who are the FISTS members on RRAP? | Policy | |||
Simple practical designing with antenna modeling programs | Antenna | |||
Scaling yagi antennas | Antenna | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
Tech+ to General upgrade question | Policy |