Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walt, W2DU wrote:
"A semantic problem with the term "Power Flow" also fuels the erroneous belief that reflected power is fictitious." Another world-class expert has agreed that power flows. Energy may or may not flow. It is the accumulation of flows that you pay for on your monthly electric bill. Power is the rate of delivering energy (doing wotk), so it can`t stand still. No power flow, no work. Take it from W2DU. Reflections are important. Reflections occur at discontinuities. To the extent that voltage and current are in-phase, they mean real power. Zo is resistive in a practical r-f transmission line. Incident and reflected waves both propagate on the line with their individual voltages and currents locked in-phase. The sum of incident and reflected waves can`t be relied upon to indicate power, but infividually each wave can indicate true power. The reflected wave interferes with the incident wave to produce standing waves. These represent the impedance distribution along the line. They do not represent variation of power in the wave in eather direction. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Failure of Poor Concepts in Discussing Glare Reduction | Antenna | |||
Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? | Equipment | |||
Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? | Equipment |