LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 03, 09:50 PM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:
"I thought this was dead long ago."

So did I. This recent posting is a repetition for me, but sometimes
repetition is needed for those who weren`t there in whole or in part for
the earlier postings.

I don`t expect anyone to accept a statement without proof from me that
ordinary circuit analysis does not apply to antennas, but from 3 E.E.
Sc. D.`s who were at the time they made the statement giving their very
best for victory in WW-2, I would expect some serious consideration and
at least a first assumption that the opinion is correct.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 454 December 12th 03 03:39 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017