| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike, W4EF wrote:
"What I am getting at is that both camps may be wrong." One of the arguments is that current into one end of a loading coil equals current out of the other end of the coil. That is not required of an antenna loading coil in the middle of an antenna. Recall the diagram of a center loaded short vertical whip from ON4UN`s Fig 9-22 that Yuri Blanarovich posted early in the dispute. 45-degrees of the 90-degree total antenna length is replaced by the loading coil. Current tapers cosinusoidally from 1A at the drivepoint to 0A at the tip. Cosine of 22.5-degrees = 0.924 Cosine of 67.5-degrees = 0.383 Roy sarcastically referred to "Yuri`s Cosine law". Yuri is right. Current into the bottom of the coil is 0.924 A, and into the top of the coil it is 0.383 A. Roy disappeared from the argument. Yuri seems to have tired of the dispute too. On page 86, King, Mimno, and Wing say: "It is fundamentally incorrect to treat a centerdriven antenna as though it were the bent-open ends of a two-wire line." This is true for a whip as a continuation of a coax line too. The antenna should radiate and the line should not. The difference between an antenna and a transmission line is fundamental. Consider the equivalent circuit of the balanced line. It is made from distributed series-connected inductors with distributed capacitors shunted across the inductor junctions. The two line conductors are closely coupled and enforce balance in the line. The close equal and opposite currents discourage radiation from the line. Attach a non-radiating balanced load across the feedline. The currents into both terminals of the load must be the same. There is much looser coupling between the two sides of a dipole than between the wires of a transmission line. In a transmission line feeding a mismatched load, the reflected energy "sees" Zo as does the incident energy traveling the line. Zo is enforced in both directions by the inductance and capacitance distributed uniformly in the line. Due to energy escape in an antenna, incident and reflected energy can "see" differing impedances on either end of a loading coil. The coil doesn`t enjoy the type of enforced balanced feed imposed by a balanced transmission. The feed at its ends is asymmetrical. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||