Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Mark Keith wrote: The issue as far as I'm concerned is: does this taper drastically cause error in modeling compared to lumped elements? I think the answer is essentially, no. So you haven't tried to model an antenna with a 180 degree phase- reversing coil, have you? :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |