| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Richard Clark" wrote
"Richard Fry" wrote: But as I wrote, nowhere do they specifically report the actual ground conductivity for the antenna site, or along the 0.3 mile propagation path of the test. If you can find that anywhere in that paper, I will promptly retract my statement, and apologize. As stated previously: "Fig. 6 shows the actual current in the earth for the same conditions" The "same conditions" are explicitly specified with conductivity. etc __________ Yes, BL&E reported on the currents in the radials and the total ground currents during the test (as I already stated), but that is not the issue. The issue is whether or not not they explicity reported the value of Earth conductivity for the test site and propagation path--and they did not. Nor was it important to the conclusions of the test. RF |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Ground radials -- the practicalities? | Antenna | |||
| Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
| hustler antenna | Antenna | |||
| Having trouble laying your radials? | Policy | |||
| ground radials? | Antenna | |||