Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MD" wrote in message
... Lots of good information here guys, I appreciate all the help. Currently I am using a long wire elevated at the ghastly height of 15' using the eaves of the house as a counterpoise. I can work stations out to ~ 400-500 kms, maybe that is the best I can manage. Once again, thanks for all the help. de VE3TMT I failed to notice you did not want to use open wire line. If you use inductive loading, for example: nominal 46 uH, Q = 200, at 15 ft from each end of a 66 ft dipole. The radiation efficiency is 71%, i.e you loose 1.5 dB in the loading coils. The input impedance is 28 ohms, and the losses on 60 ft of RG213 will only be 0.24 dB. Orientation of the dipole is unimportant since at 30 ft high the radiation is essentially omni-directional. 73, Frank |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank" wrote in message news:X2lMe.197169$tt5.130324@edtnps90... I failed to notice you did not want to use open wire line. If you use inductive loading, for example: nominal 46 uH, Q = 200, at 15 ft from each end of a 66 ft dipole. The radiation efficiency is 71%, i.e you loose 1.5 dB in the loading coils. The input impedance is 28 ohms, and the losses on 60 ft of RG213 will only be 0.24 dB. Orientation of the dipole is unimportant since at 30 ft high the radiation is essentially omni-directional. 73, Frank Hi Frank, Unfortunately using open-wire is not an option, as I have to feed the feedline in through the exterior brick wall of the house. I have 2 feedlines running out now. One to the R7 and the other for experimenting. I am going to try your suggestions with the loading coils, as soon as I get back from vacation!! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MD wrote:
"Frank" wrote in message news:X2lMe.197169$tt5.130324@edtnps90... I failed to notice you did not want to use open wire line. If you use inductive loading, for example: nominal 46 uH, Q = 200, at 15 ft from each end of a 66 ft dipole. The radiation efficiency is 71%, i.e you loose 1.5 dB in the loading coils. The input impedance is 28 ohms, and the losses on 60 ft of RG213 will only be 0.24 dB. Orientation of the dipole is unimportant since at 30 ft high the radiation is essentially omni-directional. 73, Frank Hi Frank, Unfortunately using open-wire is not an option, as I have to feed the feedline in through the exterior brick wall of the house. I have 2 feedlines running out now. One to the R7 and the other for experimenting. I am going to try your suggestions with the loading coils, as soon as I get back from vacation!! Can you get something through a window? If the window can be opened, you can place plexiglas or wood in the window, and then cut the appropriate openings for ladder line. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Short lot 80 and possible 160 antenna suggestions | Antenna | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave |