Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy, if he reads the impedance value he can determine resonance by the
absence of the reactive term. Do you agree that the SWR scan is a poor method of determining resonance? Roy Lewallen wrote: dansawyeror wrote: On the SWR scan is there a way to print or plot the step outputs? I am trying to determine the resonance point. The SWR scan automatically produces a plot. To print, click File, then Print in the SWR display window. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ham op wrote:
Roy, if he reads the impedance value he can determine resonance by the absence of the reactive term. Do you agree that the SWR scan is a poor method of determining resonance? No, I usually use the SWR sweep to determine resonance. Stepping the cursor and looking at the impedance at each step quickly identifies the resonant frequency to within the closest step. Additional narrower scans are done as necessary to get more precision. What method do you use that's better? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
80 meter loaded vertical versus 80 meter loaded dipole ? | Antenna | |||
Ferrite loaded vertical antenna??? | Antenna | |||
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |