Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dansawyeror wrote:
Roy, Thanks, I did and I have tried all the combinations. I would suspect that 'free space' would show a mis match for 'short radials'. It does not. Simulations of free space dipoles seem accurate. Am I missing something? You'll need to send me the model description (.EZ file) so I can see what you've got. Attach it to an email to me. I also tried to simulate several values of real earth. None of them produced high input impedance values. What ground values represent suburban clay? We have clay here, and by comparing a dipole and vertical at various times of year, I've estimated that the soil is about equivalent to EZNEC's "poor" quality ground in the summer when it's bone dry and "very good" ground in the winter when soaking wet. It's an approximation at best, though. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
80 meter loaded vertical versus 80 meter loaded dipole ? | Antenna | |||
Ferrite loaded vertical antenna??? | Antenna | |||
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |