Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Phil found a simple dipole only a few feet above ground would outperform a mobile whip on 40 or 75 meters. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Without more information, this comparison is flawed. A mobile whip has a lower angle of radiation than a horizontal dipole. On 40 or 75, the vertical component of radiation can be quite significant for close-in stations (100 miles or so). At night, working long distances, the whip may outperform the dipole. During the day, the dipole will probably outperform the whip. It all depends. 73, Bill W6WRT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |