Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Cecil Moore
writes Ian Jackson wrote: Are you sure it's as high as that, Reg? I once did a Smith Chart plot of the impedance at the centre of a dipole, the valued being taken from a table 'compiled by Wu' (LK Wu?). These only catered for a lengths up to a few wavelengths. As the plot progressed round and round the Smith Chart, it seemed to be heading for something around 350 to 400 ohms. Maybe 377 ohms? Remember that any finite length dipole is a standing wave antenna and the feedpoint impedance is (Vfor+Vref)/(Ifor+Iref) where Vfor is the forward voltage phasor, Vref is the reflected voltage phasor, Ifor is the forward current phasor, and Iref is the reflected current phasor. For a 1/2WL resonant dipole the feedpoint impedance is low: R = (|Vfor|-|Vref|)/(|Ifor|+|Iref|) ~ 73 ohms For a 1WL (anti)resonant dipole the feedpoint impedance is high: R = (|Vfor|+|Vref|)/(|Ifor|-|Iref|) ~ 5200 ohms (EZNEC) An infinite dipole would not be a standing wave antenna. It would be a traveling wave antenna (as in a terminated rhombic). So the feedpoint impedance of an infinite dipole would be Vfor/Ifor=Z0. Since the reflections modify the feedpoint impedance, we might suspect that Vfor/Ifor falls between the feedpoint impedance for a 1/2WL dipole and a one WL dipole. Seems to me, the Z0 of the dipole, i.e. Vfor/Ifor, must be in the ballpark of the square root of the product of those two feedpoint impedances. Yes, I did think of 377 ohms (which I understand is 'the impedance of free space'), but I'm no expert in these matters. As you indicate, the impedance must lie somewhere between 73 and 5200 ohms. You suggest that this might be something like the square root of the product of those two feedpoint impedances (the geometric mean), which gives 616 ohms. However, you would see 600 ohms simply by looking into an infinite length of 600 ohm feeder, which has parallel, non-radiating conductors. If the length of the feeder was relatively short (compared with infinity!!), pulling the conductors apart would increase the impedance (probably to a lot more than 616 ohms). The question is, 'when does radiation start to influence the impedance?' If you look at K6OIK's paper at http://www.fars.k6ya.org/docs/antenn...nce-models.pdf and look at, for example, page 22, you can see how the feed impedance at odd halfwaves increases, and at even halfwaves, decreases. I only found this paper this morning, and haven't had time to look to see which (if any) of the many formulas was used to obtain the plot. It must be possible to get close to the infinity condition by entering values for a very, very long dipole. Cheers, Ian. -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Putting a Ferrite Rod at the Far-End of a Random Wire Antenna ? | Antenna | |||
Putting a Ferrite Rod at the Far-End of a Random Wire Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
My new antenna ... | Shortwave | |||
DDS 50 ohms buffer ? | Homebrew | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |