Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards"
But I'm afraid you are wrong. The meter correctly indicates SWR on the feedline when it is located at the antenna end of the line. ______________ Remove the feedline, and connect the 100 ohm antenna through the SWR meter calibrated for 50 ohms, directly to the transmitter. The meter has a reading. The measurement will have the same value as before, neglecting any adjustment for having no line loss now. But there is no feedline, so how can there be any SWR on it, you write. The fact that there is not enough transmission line length in the system for literal standing wave maxima and minima to develop on it does not mean that reflections do not exist in the output load system. It is the value of those reflections that determines the corresponding value of SWR. Reflections can be measured by appropriate instruments regardless of the length of line in the measured system, or even the existence of any transmission line at all. The convention of the professional engineering community for many decades has been to convert incident and reflected waveform samples into the corresponding value of SWR, no matter if there is insufficient line length in the system for the corresponding maxima and minima to develop fully on it. It doesn't matter, electrically. Your constant diatribes stating that it does is a futile exercise. Disable the SWR protection in your ham tx and key it to full power into an open or short. There is no transmission line where standing wave maxima and minima could exist, but your tx will burn up anyway. Maybe save your response until tomorrow morning, when your Merlot buzz has worn off ![]() RF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards"
But I'm afraid you are wrong. The meter correctly indicates SWR on the feedline when it is located at the antenna end of the line. ______________ PS: In this example the mismatch between the antenna and the line is the source of the reflection that results in system SWR. Convention is to state that the SWR belongs to the antenna, not the line -- although the added stress on components applies only to the line and tx, and not to the antenna. An ideal SWR meter will read that antenna reflection to have the same value when installed at either end of the line, or anywhere along its length (assuming a perfect 50 ohm line, and neglecting line loss). RF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: UHF Duplexers and Cavity | Swap | |||
FS: Icom RP-2210 repeater with 4 cavity duplexer | Equipment | |||
help identify: Varian VMC-1680 (5.5 GHz oscillator; Magnetron? Klystron?) | Homebrew | |||
FS: cavity for 829 tubes | Boatanchors | |||
Fuel Tanks and Cereal Silos as Cavity Resonators for HF | Homebrew |