Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all.
No doubt I could get this reading lots and lots of text books. It might however be interesting to air a discussion on it.. Have been reading the free space pathloss formula from the ARRL antenna handbook; Loss in dB = K + 20logf + 20logD Where f is the freq in GHz and D is the distance in miles K is a constant of around 96.6dB I have known about a "fixed K" loss in an antenna system for ages. It even made mention I think in this NG recently when talking about a passive repeater system. From my own exposure to path modelling (EDX/Pathloss etc) I noted a very high dB loss per distance rate in the first (say) 100 wavelengths when looking at graphs of same. (I wasnt doing the actual job, just providing data to the engineer to compare measured with predicted. Fascinating stuff!) What I wonder is where roughly does the 96dB odd "come from". More interestingly can it be reduced by any appreciable amount. Is it maybe a antenna to "air" coupling loss, maybe even that a RX antenna cant possibly extract all of the energy from the wave as it goes past. I would appreciate any input on this. My initial forays (as a young ham) into LOS paths went through the isotropic/point source radiators and looking at the surface area of the covered "sphere" containing all of the radiated power idea. Then the RX antenna "aperture" area was used to calculate the actual received power. Needless to say it never met the actual measured values! Cheers Bob VK2YQA (in W5) |