Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 19:56:48 GMT, Ed wrote: Dumb sounding question----but-----with a ladderline fed dipole, is the feedline supposed to radiate and be part of the antenna, under some conditions? NOT a dumb question. I was always under the impression that radiation from the two parallel wires in ladderline was supposed to cancel itself out... ergo no radiation. That's why they call it a balanced feedling. Ed, your unstated assumptions is critical to the correctness of your statement. At sufficient distance from the parallel line, the fields from each conductor are canceling providing the currents in each conductor are exactly equal in magnitude and exactly opposite in phase. Under those conditions, the parallel line is also balanced feed line. Achieving those conditions (or a sufficient approximation) doesn't happen automatically in the real world. There are all manner of things in practical applications that would cause unbalance in the currents in the conductors. If the currents are not balanced, the fields will not cancel, and there will be radiation to some extent, so the feed line does indeed become part of the radiating system to some extent. Conversely, feed line capture would contribute to some extent to received energy. Owen -- Would twisting the ladder line help? -- William Warren (Filter noise from my address for direct replies) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|