Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RST Engineering wrote:
In my humble opinion, EZNEC is a POS for anything other than a simple "wire antenna". Try to do a true ground plane with bent radials? Try to do a simple patch? Try to do a J? Try to do ANY configuration other than a wire dipole and the sucker chokes. I've modeled ground planes with bent radials and J antennas using EZNEC and got reasonable results. Never tried a patch. EZNEC's limitations are well known and well documented so knowledgeable users can avoid those pitfalls. Of course, nothing is foolproof. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anyone have an EZNEC Windom Model | Antenna | |||
Super Antennas MP-1 EZNEC model | Antenna | |||
EZNEC Model of 88ft doublet | Antenna | |||
EZNEC Model of a Terminated Vee-Beam | Antenna | |||
EZNEC v. 4.0 at Dayton | Antenna |