Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't see how the wires are numbered can be important; it's how they
connect, isn't it? You are probably right My rational for always (almost always) using wire 1 to hold the source is that them I can add or subtract wires without having to change the source wire designation. Good point. What I have noticed is that similar structures (GP with depressed radials, for example) produce erroneous TRP results. Please explain "TRP". "Total Radiated Power" It will be interesting to try such computations on variants of your sleeve antenna. My results did not show significant current on the outer shield of the coax. This may be due to my inability to implement the "Mininec" ground. Run it without any ground. Run it without any sleeve. Just put a trap (or a high value resistor) at one end of a center-fed halfwave vertical to represent the sleeve (choke) and then add various lengths of wire on the other side of the trap. With no ground, the current on the added wire will peak at multiples of 1/4 wavelength. So much for the trap "isolating" the rest of the antenna. Ok. I don't know what "S/M" ground is -- Oops, did I say S/M? What I meant was S/N (Sommerfeld/Norton). -- but EZNEC supports perfect ground, Sommerfeld-Norton and MiniNEC grounds. And I believe the object is to *not* have to input files as NEC code.:-) Ok, but I like to type it in cold, so see if I can get the cards in the right order. Frank |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anyone have an EZNEC Windom Model | Antenna | |||
Super Antennas MP-1 EZNEC model | Antenna | |||
EZNEC Model of 88ft doublet | Antenna | |||
EZNEC Model of a Terminated Vee-Beam | Antenna | |||
EZNEC v. 4.0 at Dayton | Antenna |