Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi again Jim
I'd suspect you need an attenuator of maybe 60dB in 6dB steps! I cant see the 10dB variable one as being useful. Of course at 50dB or more coax leakage might be an issue! The other researcher you mentioned most likely dropped to signal strength only mode when they got close. Antenna directivity up close in my view isnt a viable way of doing it. As a rough guide you get a 6dB change in signal power everytime you double or halve the distance. This means that if you maximum signal measured distance is maybe 6ft and it must work out to 2000 yards then you have to allow for 60dB of measurement range. This is further complicated by the turtle antenna being at ground level, in fact in the mud and dirt. I dont know what that loss represents but I'd add 30dB to be sure. Your whole system then must have some method of measuring over that range of 90 odd dB and have useful directional nulls etc doing so. This is where the big step attenuator and antenna changing/removal help. Should the antenna work okay? I guess the question is did you include the ground in the modelling? Obviously you'd get some major sky direction lobes/response from ground reflection but the worry is how it affects overall directivity. My gut feel is that the F/B would be markedly different and nowhere near the 48dB. At 1M above ground there may be sufficient detuning of elements to widen the frontal lobe but I doubt it would be a huge excursion. Do you find the null is much sharper than the frontal lobe? The bottom line though is that in your application it isnt as critical as someone (like amateurs) trying for maximum performance. This means I should stop complaining! Okay on the screening. Well as I mentioned the test is to plug a 50 ohm load in the antenna socket and see if it responds at a distance of say 5ft. If it doesnt then dont worry about screening. If it does it depends on how much and then whether things like coax leakage have to be factored in. I'll stop ranting/waffling on now..! Cheers Bob Jim wrote: True, I haven't thought of everything, but I have done this: |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
GP -> yagi driven element? | Antenna | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
Quad vs Yagi (or log) | Antenna | |||
Remodelling commercial VHF yagi beams. | Antenna |