Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message m... Richard Clark wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:51:02 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: Sorry, I am just quoting Owen's results. There is nothing in his entire scope of postings that presents: There was 4.1667 watts of reflected energy flowing back through the Bird. Which is absurd. The SWR on the 75 ohm line is 1.5:1. If 100 watts is delivered to the load, there's 4.1667 watts of energy reflected from the load and flowing back through the Bird. The Bird doesn't see it because the Bird is calibrated for the wrong Z0. Owen has demonstrated quite clearly that your assertion It takes a certain length of feedline to establish a Z0 environment is blarney from one end of your feedline to the other. Really? They why bother with characteristic impedance at all? If Z0 doesn't establish a Z0 environment, then all transmission lines are just alike and transmission theory is hogwash. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Cecil, I can't figure out which side you are on. There is no Z0 environment set up; the Bridge is balanced for a chosen Z0, actually R0. Tam/WB2TT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
V/I ratio is forced to Z0 | Antenna | |||
S/N ratio question - have I got this right? | Antenna | |||
S/N ratio question - have I got this right? | Equipment | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
speaker impedance transformation | Homebrew |