| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote:
As the last "thin-film" comment reveals, it has always been about how one mind can encompass two contradictory positions (total cancellation - non total cancellation) about the same mechanism (a quarterwave matching section). In other words: A Troll. If the incident irradiance is a single frequency coherent signal, the requirement for TOTAL CANCELLATION OF REFLECTIONS is still that the index of refraction of the 1/4WL thin-film be the square root of the medium upon which it is deposited. QED -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| V/I ratio is forced to Z0 | Antenna | |||
| S/N ratio question - have I got this right? | Antenna | |||
| S/N ratio question - have I got this right? | Equipment | |||
| The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
| speaker impedance transformation | Homebrew | |||