Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:36:11 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
these voltages match the voltage drops across R1 and R2 in amplitude. There is NO R1 and/or R2 This is familiar bait and switch methods so common to your trolling. Changing the schematics to suit the argument can make any answer come alive. Like I said, if you were already familiar with this, you would have said so and skipped all this stageshowing. In other words, it is the main Z0 calibration setting An interpretation spanning as many documents as it takes to assemble all the words xeroxed to this posting. If the range of C1 and C2 are great enough, the wattmeter could be calibrated for 75 ohms rather than 50 ohms. Notably, there are no C1 and/or C2. Even more, if there were, any competent tech in this group would be aware that it also would take a similar shift in value of your R1 and/or R2. In fact, this overstatement by calling out BOTH Cs needing change begs the chuckle reflex being stifled. The question is: Between the "transmitter" terminal and the "antenna" terminal, what determines the physical characteristic impedance of the sampling circuit? It is very lightly loading as a series load by design and as evidenced by Dave's measurements. Exactly how much effect does that light loading have on the primary voltage/current amplitude and phase? Enough to be detectable if the V/I ratio is not 50 ohms? [clue: this is in the portion of my original post that you omitted.] I would normally ask my students "What do you think?" but there is a danger of that here, with so little obtained in return for so much said. Rather, I will offer "Think about it. How much power does it take to swing a 1mA meter even full scale when there is a 500KOhm calibration resistor (imagine that, do we assign THAT as the Z?) limiting it." Something about IČR comes to mind for max power (300W) which works out to half a watt out of 300 supplied. A simple, back-of-the-napkin computation suggests less than 1%. A similar study of the actual load of 82 Ohms needs only be cast back through the NČ turns ratio. Seeing that it, too, is probably a quarter Watt resistor that we are still talking about less than 1% consumption. So, anyway you slice and dice it without actually counting the turns ratio, the tech at the bench would easily offer the meter injects only half an ohm or less series resistance into the line. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
V/I ratio is forced to Z0 | Antenna | |||
S/N ratio question - have I got this right? | Antenna | |||
S/N ratio question - have I got this right? | Equipment | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
speaker impedance transformation | Homebrew |