| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard,
What you said is largely accurate, however at low S/N ratios, or where the distortion becomes comparable to the signal level, the reading of the composite signal (signal+noise+distortion) with anything other than an RMS meter could produce erroneous results. Joe W3JDR "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:08:22 -0500, "Steve Nosko" wrote: A meter, a pure 1kHz tone modulated signal generator and a 1kHz notch is all that is needed. What happens if you don't have a "real" RMS meter? I don't know. Hi Steve, You don't need a "real" RMS meter. The expressed requirement for a pure 1kHz tone provides the necessary sine wave shape such that it simply becomes a matter of scale calibration. If you had said a square wave 1KHz tone (nothing pure about that), then you would have to dig deep for a "real" RMS meter. That too, could be scaled, but I wouldn't count on it because it would be a rare amplifier chain that could faithfully keep it square - and the notch would inject it into the measurement as distortion and noise. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| SINAD Measurements | Equipment | |||
| Which one is a better scanner and why? | Scanner | |||
| Yaesu VR-500 (updated) | Swap | |||
| Yaesu VR-500 | Swap | |||
| FS: MINT AOR AR-8600 Scanner/Receiver | Swap | |||