Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#151
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message et... However, we did casually look into purchasing a house with the idea of possibly making that area our home. During that process, we ran into several houses with CC&R's (especially in the north-eastern part of town). But, on the south side of town, none of the houses had a CC&R. But I don't doubt the mostly open, mostly country, areas east of Indy are still relatively free of CC&R's. I do not know of _any_ single addition that was built in the 70s/80s without CC&Rs actually vote to have them. In my area alone, there are 4 older neighborhoods....none of them have CC&Rs. CC&Rs were rare and usually for the high end neighborhoods. Now all the newer neighborhoods have CC&Rs. The whole point is that besides the northside, Hamilton Co., and newer additions...Indy provides plenty of neighborhoods on all sides that do not have CC&Rs. I guess that is why I like it here and decided against moving to see other parts of the country. I can only imagine how horrible mega cities are. Still, fact is that Indy does offer plenty in terms of jobs in almost all fields...especially bio-technology tied in with pharmaceuticals. If I ever moved it would be to a like size city, and Montana, Idaho area would be my first choice. |
#152
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "craigm" wrote in message ... Which cities in Montana and Idaho are the same size as Indianpolis? Largest cities... Billings, MT 131,622 Boise, ID 185,787 Indianapolis, IN 1,607,486 There were 3 times more people in Indy in 1910 than there are in Boise today.. |
#153
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Strange thing about home values, investment, etc -- In Silicon Valley aka
San Francisco Bay Area - homes are in the high 100,000+ -- many a Million+ and many with no HOA and old TV/FM antennas left on the roof -- as well as more than the average number of Ham antennas. -- 73 From The Wilderness Keyboard |
#154
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Midwest Kid" wrote in message news:6_Ayb.270995$275.965769@attbi_s53... Investment in your home, to me, means what you paid for your home. Property value is what someone is supposedly willing to pay for your land and home. It doesn't necessary mean your actual investment in the home. If a chemical spill is discovered near the area, your property value might be $50K while your investment could be $100K (what you paid for your home). People want to equate property values with an investment that will _always_ go up, mostly due to the real estate boom over the last 3 decades or so. I don't see many people like that. Out of all my family, only a cousin actually rents a home. No many people buy a home, let it sit empty and hope that they can sell it for 30% more in a year. That is the main problem with CC&R. People think they are a way to help your property value increase. That's stupid logic. They should be more worried about just making sure they get what they put into the home. I believe CC&Rs do that. They make it so people can sell their home. I don't know if CC&Rs help home sales. People buy and sell homes without CC&Rs just fine. CC&Rs may be a negitive factor, if you consider the large number of potential buyers who don't like CC&Rs. I personally wouldn't have a problem with a ham antenna as long as it didn't interfere with anything in my home. If it did, I would ask the person to take it down. Chances are I would be a good friend to my neighbors since I am pretty easy to get along with. It's when hams get this attitude (like I am seeing here) spouting off: "Well, I got a new law supporting me so not much you or anyone else can do." That's when the gloves come off. Screw them. They thought they had a friend....I hope the person never needs something or tries to make small talk. Well, people do have rights, although the right to put up an antenna may not be among the rights the Constitutional government was formed to protect. As far as the value of a Homeowner's Association is concerned, I guess it comes down to which of your neighbors deserve the most distrust. Will it be the new neighbor who inexplicably paints his new, expensive house pink and black like a box of Ju-Ju Bees? Or will it be the new age neighbors who replace the previous reasonable board members with a bunch of Feng Shui loonies? They'll come and do a walkaround with their compasses and tape measures and notebooks. "Pull up those pink flamingoes and put wind chimes here." "You must plant a tree. I marked the correct location with a stake." "Move that doorway to here. No, not there -- HERE!!" "Bad Feng Shui is bad for property values!!" Can't happen? Of course not! Not in anyplace that can't stop a respectful flag display or religious monument. Frank Dresser |
#155
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "craigm" wrote in message .. Which cities in Montana and Idaho are the same size as Indianpolis? I should have said the size of Indy or smaller. |
#156
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank I have been reading the various posting in this thread. And some
of the posting here disgust me. Why do some of these people call themselves American's? America is supposed to be the land of the FREE. By far, this posting by you is the best. I have read most of the articles in the second web site you listed. It's about time America wakes up. The world doesn't revolve around HOA's or there darn rules. As a veteran I have flown the Stars and Strips at our home since I returned from the military (35+ years ago) and will do until I expire. I, unlike some in this thread are proud of my country. I am proud to fly the Stars & Strips over our home. I am proud to have served in the military of these United States of America. I am also proud to have served in the military only to protect the rights of HOA's and their over baring officials, to forbid Americans from flying there FLAG on a poll erected for this purpose only. And they call themselves patriotic Americans........ya. Frank Dresser wrote: http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b5efc12221e.htm#38 http://www.ccfj.net/HOAartflag.html As far as I'm concerned, any attempt to restrict such fundamental rights as a respectful religious display or display of the US Flag ought to get laughed out of court, just as an attempt to enforce a racial restrictive covanant. Frank Dresser |
#158
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
America will only be FREE as long as real Americans allow it to be. And presently that doesn't seem to include HOA's or their officials. Question is, If HOA's object to the, "Land of the Free, and the Home of the Brave", why don't they simply move to another country (like Cuba)? I've had a long life and careers in TX, CA, and AZ. I have *NEVER* signed on to an HOA agreement, and I never will. If one freely chooses to compromise one's principles, then one gets exactly what one deserves. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#159
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... wrote: America will only be FREE as long as real Americans allow it to be. And presently that doesn't seem to include HOA's or their officials. Question is, If HOA's object to the, "Land of the Free, and the Home of the Brave", why don't they simply move to another country (like Cuba)? I've had a long life and careers in TX, CA, and AZ. I have *NEVER* signed on to an HOA agreement, and I never will. If one freely chooses to compromise one's principles, then one gets exactly what one deserves. It floors me how some Americans can defend the loss of the principles upon which the country was founded, and for which our troops are supposed to be fighting. As a country, we do great dishonor to those who have died to protect our freedom by giving up that freedom voluntarily under the guise of personal or financial security. |
#160
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Midwest Kid wrote: "Dave Shrader" wrote in message news:m9wyb.372045$Tr4.1101837@attbi_s03... The buyer's requested assurance that the antenna and tower would be removed prior to passing papers. My response "Of course!" So here we have: 1: The people did not want the antennas. Stop taking a position OUT of Context. The new owners were/are not hams. But the tower and antennas are in my new backyard. Restated, the tower had NO IMPACT on the selling price of the property! The property sold based on LOCATION. I had lived there for 38+ years prior to sale. BTW, the home across the street and the home next door also sold for above market value. 2: It's more like "**** my neighbor. Your vulgarisms are not appreciated in my house and hopefully other homes. Get the emotion out of your argument and please present your case on facts using civil language. Remember this group is read by men, women, and possibly children. Deacon Dave [Reverend], W1MCE SNIP |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|