Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Painter wrote:
"I may have missed any theory about the 1/4 wavelength being the optimal height---." I missed that too, unless your aim is near vertical incidence reflection from the ionosphere for nearby contacts. Some hams have that goal and argue that 1/4-wave height is enough because it gives the first elevation that produces the drivepoint impedance of the horizontal dipole in free-space. The purpose of the antenna is communication, not impedance. A friendly impedance helps of course. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|